Jointly published by Elsevier Sdence S. A., Lausanne and Akad~miai Kiad6, Budapest
J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.,Letters 201 (6) 481-493 (1995)
C H A R A C T E R I Z A T I O N OF TWO I R R A D I A T I O N P O S I T I O N S FOR F I S S I O N T R A C K D A T I N G AT THE L E N A T R I G A M A R K II R E A C T O R
G. B i g a z z i ,
Istituto
J.C.
H a d l e r Neto*, P. Iunes*, M. O d d o n e * * *
S. M e l o n i * * ,
CNR di G e o c r o n o l o g i a e G e o c h i m i c a Pisa, I t a l y
. *Instituto
de F i s i c a
"Gleb W a t a g h i n " , SP, Brazil
Isotopica,
UNICAMP,
Campinas,
* * C e n t r o C N R per la R a d i o c h i m i c a e l ' A n a l i s i per A t t i v a z i o n e , D i p a r t m e n t o di C h i m i c a G e n e r a l e , U n i v e r s i t l di Pavia, Pavia, Italy * * * D i p a r t i m e n t o di C h i m i c a G e n e r a l e , U n i v e r s i t ~ di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Received Accepted
8 September 22 S e p t e m b e r
1995 1995
In the p r e s e n t p a p e r the use of two n a t u r a l u r a n i u m d o s i m e t e r s is described. D a t a are c o m p a r e d w i t h f l u e n c e v a l u e s o b t a i n e d by u s i n g N I S T glass s t a n d a r d s and t h e tradit i o n a l a c t i v a t i o n of m e t a l foils. F i n a l l y an e x a m p l e is r e p o r t e d for a p p l i c a t i o n of n e u t r o n d o s i m e t r y to the dating of the Fish C a n y o n Tuff age standard.
INTRODUCTION Fission butions
track d a t i n g
disciplines, ogy.
However,
requires
(FTM)
to the a d v a n c e m e n t
such as geology, the r e l e a s e
a careful
in d i f f e r e n t
geochemistry
and a r c h a e o l -
of h i g h l y r e l i a b l e
evaluation
0236-5731/95/US $ 9.50 Copyright 9 1995 Akadgmiai Kiad6, Budapest All rights reserved
has b r o u g h t g r e a t c o n t r i -
of k n o w l e d g e
481
age d a t a
of the m e t h o d o l o g i c a l
ap-
BIGAZZI el al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
proach
and a c r i t i c a l
r e v i e w of p o s s i b l e
sources
of er-
rors. In any c a s e the use of FTM i n v o l v e s a nuclear occur.
reactor
so t h a t the
In an ideal e x p e r i m e n t a l
s h o u l d be v e r y w e l l
thermalized
s h o u l d be n e g l i g i b l e ence s h o u l d propagated tions
(n,f)
(or w e l l
be p r e c i s e l y
set-up, and
The n e u t r o n
These
are n o t u s u a l l y m e t and t h e r e f o r e
tion b e c o m e s
a relevant
flux
gradients flu-
as its u n c e r t a i n t y
up to the e r r o r in age.
in
on 235U m a y
the n e u t r o n
spatial
known).
known
an i r r a d i a t i o n
reaction
ideal
condi-
neutron
s o u r c e of s y s t e m a t i c
is
irradia-
errors
in
FTM. Interlaboratory fluences
comparisons
are g i v e n w i t h
t u a t i o n of age v a l u e s larger than expected
have
shown that,
satisfactory
around
precision,
the m e a n
by s t a t i s t i c s .
are
which
fluence
determination.
In o r d e r worthwhile the used
(n,f)
could cause
Probably
systematic
nuclear
for dating,
and for w h i c h
tity can be d e t e r m i n e d related
to n e u t r o n
pointed
out that, w h e n
independently
can o c c u r d u r i n g n e u t r o n in n e u t r o n
energy
and burn-up,
the n u m b e r
of c a d m i u m
Therefore,
same as
uranium
quan-
a u t h o r s I-3 and a s p e c i m e n
any a n o m a l y
that
such as v a r i a t i o n
ratio,
the e x p r e s s i o n
for the n a t u r a l
to be dated.
on
c h a n g i n g of fuel g e o m e t r y
of f i s s i o n e v e n t s
the same both specimen
irradiation,
spectrum,
variation
e f f e c t on both.
together,
it seems
of any p a r a m e t e r
Several
such d o s i m e t e r s
to be d a t e d are i r r a d i a t e d
in
operate
just the
the n a t u r a l
irradiation.
dosim-
differencies
dosimetries which
r e a c t i o n on 235U,
fluc-
an e x p l a n a -
neutron
to cut down the e r r o r i n c i d e n c e , to use n e u t r o n
the
significantly
tion m a y be f o u n d in the use of d i f f e r e n t etries,
although
per u r a n i u m uranium
Of c o u r s e 482
have the
same
that d e s c r i b e s target
atom is
dosimeters
the o c c u r r e n c e
and the
of the
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
same n a t u r a l samples
isotopic
is a s s u m e d
Neutron propriate
ratio
and,
dosimeters if other
between
if necessary,
using
natural
fissionable
for instance,
produce
fission
events
specimen.
be i g n o r e d
if i r r a d i a t i o n s
thermalized
neutron
In the p r e s e n t dosimeters values
traditional ample
dosimetry
are not apsuch as
non-negligible This
amounts
interference
are c a r r i e d
paper
of
may
out in h i g h l y
the use of two natural Data
by u s i n g N I S T
activation
is r e p o r t e d
uranium
fluxes.
is described.
obtained
verified.
impurities,
thorium
in the
235U and 238U in both
are c o m p a r e d w i t h glass
of m e t a l
standards
foils.
of a p p l i c a t i o n
to the d a t i n g
uranium fluence
and the
Finally
of n e u t r o n
an ex-
fiuence
of the Fish C a n y o n
Tuff
age
standard.
EXPERIMENTAL Neutron
dosimeters
Different ate n e u t r o n I - Gold
neutron fluences
fluence
glasses
sheets
induced
sandwiched are those
for S c i e n c e
glasses
where
by c o u n t i n g
on the g l a s s
by NIST
and T e c h n o l o g y ,
to evalu-
irradiated.
the
irradiated
483
Standard
facilities
Insti-
Standard Two g l a s s e s
at the N I S T
flux and t h e r m a l i z a t i o n
Flux monitoring
or on a
(National
USA).
Neutron
fission
surface
in a 6 sheet kit.
in two i r r a d i a t i o n
acterized.
to be n e u t r o n
to it 4. The m o s t u s e d
are a v a i l a b l e
neutron
been u s e d
loaded w i t h uranium.
released
had been p r e v i o u s l y reactor
foils
can be d e t e r m i n e d
density
detector
tute
glass
have
for FTM.
and c o b a l t m e t a l
2 - Artificial
track
dosimeters
nuclear
(RT3 and RT4), are w e l l
was p e r f o r m e d
char-
by m e a s u r i n g
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
the i n d u c e d son w i t h ating
fission
the N I S T
uranium
Experiments
tored
number 140Ce
starting
(stable),
Parent
whose
with
times
end of i r r a d i a t i o n produced
during
irradiation during
Yagoda's
lodium
selected
surface. used
10 -2 ~m.
In the case
short
amounts
thin
stage
attached
on a a low
a thin
film to the
A second
heat-
to get a
to the m u s c o v i t e thin
films
from 3.0 x 10 -4 to 3.7 x atoms
by n u c l e a r
film is c l o s e l y 484
nitrate,
adhering
of the u r a n i u m
of u r a n i u m
surface was evaluated
a m i c a with
to
a col-
spread
is then r e q u i r e d
ranged
parent
of longer
of uranyl
is obtained.
film
at the
according
and p a r l o d i u m
sheet
to as-
140Xe
and parlodium,
a drying
for
(and of 140La)
and c a r e f u l l y
After
and
into a c c o u n t 7.
prepared
of m u s c o v i t e ,
The n u m b e r
thin u r a n i u m
k n o w n 5-6.
140Ba
from the
of 140Ba
alcohol,
The t h i c k n e s s
in this w o r k
at m a s s
is w e l l
I%, that
be taken
(I h at 400 ~
trioxide
chain
140Ba have v e r y
only
film,
nitrate
support muscovite
at
they can be i g n o r e d
should
are m i x e d
content.
stage
yield
less than
thin
surface
o f dry u r a n y l
uranium
before
the d e c a y
in ethyl
form,
uranium
fission
p r o c e d u r e 8. E q u a l
dissolved
fission
irradiation.
times
uranium
emission
140Xe and e n d i n g w i t h
derives
irradiation
4 - Natural
to the
and
is moni-
up to 10 h it is p o s s i b l e
an e r r o r
closely
from R e a c t o r
on 235U
140Ba y - r a y
and t h e r e f o r e
irradiation
detector
obtained
reaction
with
radionuclides
half-lives
sume,
the
or by evalu-
12.7 mm in d i a m e t e r
(n,f)
140Ba b e l o n g s
140,
glasses,
by c o m p a r i -
the glass.
disk,
(USA),
The
by m e a s u r i n g
537 keV.
with
metal
Inc.
0.18 mm thick.
either
in a m u s c o v i t e
and i r r a d i a t e d
3 - Natural
density
irradiated
the FT d e n s i t y
packed
ing
track
on the
film
e m u l s i o n s 9. The
packed
to a n o t h e r
mus-
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
covite
sheet and both
radiation.
are s u b m i t t e d
The d e n s i t y
the m u s c o v i t e
of i n d u c e d
detector,
e n c y is known,
allows
once
to n e u t r o n
fission
tracks
its c o l l e c t i o n
fluence
iron
effici-
e v a l u a t i o n I0-11
Irradiations Neutron MARK
irradiations were
II r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r
while
the r e a c t o r was
power.
cadmium
by d i f f e r e n t
at 250 kW s t e a d y
state
facilities were
selected,
nominal
neutron
thermal
char-
flux and
ratio:
I - Rotatory s
out at the T R I G A
of the U n i v e r s i t y of Pavia,
operated
Two i r r a d i a t i o n
acterized
carried
--I
specimen
, Cd r a t i o
2 - Thermalizing 2.5x108
rack
(thermal
6.5 for gold and column
48 for cobalt);
(outer end,
n cm -2 s -I , Cd r a t i o
Ixi012 n cm -2
flux
thermal
flux
92 for gold and 752
for
cobalt). Radioactivity measurement Induced etry,
r a d i o a c t i v i t y was m e a s u r e d
u s i n g a 30 cm 3 Ge(Li)
detector
puter assisted multichannel located
counting
The d e t e c t o r was
(10 cm thick),
and c o p p e r
152Eu
lined w i t h
sheets r e s p e c t i v e l y .
e f f i c i e n c y was e x p e r i m e n t a l l y
a standard
spectrom-
c o u p l e d t 0 a com-
analyzer.
inside a lead s h i e l d
0.5 cm of c a d m i u m
by y-ray
source h a v i n g
measured,
the s a m e
geometry
The using as neu-
tron monitors. Fission
track d e n s i t y m e a s u r e m e n t s
Fission by s t a n d a r d 15 m i n
track d e n s i t y m e a s u r e m e n t s optical methodS
at 40 ~
after
The o p t i c a l
were
etching
efficiency
carried
for f i s s i o n
fragment track counting
in u r a n i u m
sidered unity
to l i t e r a t U r e v a l u e s 10-11
according
485
out
in 40% HF for
thin films was
con-
BIGAZZI el al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
RESULTS
AND D I S C U S S I O N
Neutron
fluences
in the r o t a t o r y
in the t h e r m a l i z i n g of the U n i v e r s i t y 2. I n d i v i d u a l deviation Table
derived
over
10800
s). For
different
neutron
reproducibility power data,
and u r a n i u m for the
for 100
1800 and 3600 monitors
was
especially disks,
obtained
in the
neutron
times
useful
dosim-
(60 to for d a t i n g of
repeated
the
flux.
to v e r i f y
and the s t a b i l i t y The p r e c i s i o n
increases s runs
with
of re-
irradiation
it is u s u a l l y
of
foils
time,
below
is shown by fluences
and
3%. An
obtained
s irradiations.
different
occurrence
of n e u s
distances
experimental
Cd ratios,
gold
47.9• data
foils
equatorial
was o b s e r v e d
at
plane,
beyond
the
spatial
gradients,
if any,
g o l d and cobalt
activation
foils
also in c a d m i u m
evaluate
Reported
gradi-
negligible.
instances
irradiated
so that
spatial
activation
from the r e a c t o r
errors,
considered
In m a n y
flux
by i r r a d i a t i n g
up to 10 cm. No flux v a r i a t i o n
and
standard
in the case of a c t i v a t i o n
poor precision
ents was v e r i f i e d
were
the
I and
s, the i r r a d i a t i o n
Of the p r o c e d u r e
and n e u t r o n
The actual
were
times
II r e a c t o r
statistics.
range of i r r a d i a t i o n
1800 and 3600
unexpected
with
fluences
some i r r a d i a t i o n
namely
ported
counting
and
in T a b l e s
rack by using d i f f e r e n t
a wide
purposes,
reactor
from
together
the n e u t r o n
specimen
eters
are r e p o r t e d
are given only
rack
of the T R I G A M a r k
of Pavia
data
I shows
rotatory
column
specimen
which were
capsules found
in order
to
to be 6.46•
for
for cobalt. indicate
are shown by the n e u t r o n
that no m e a n i n g f u l fluences
obtained
differences
by d i f f e r e n t
i
monitors.
Activation
nuclear
sion m a y be c o n s i d e r e d
reactions
equivalent 486
and i n d u c e d
for n e u t r o n
fis-
monitor-
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
TABLE
I
Neutron fluences in t h e r o t a r y s p e c i m e n r a c k of t h e T R I G A M A R K II r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r of t h e U n i v e r s i t y of P a v i a , as o b t a i n e d using different neutron monitors Irradiation time, s
Neutron monitor
Fluence, n am -2 x 1015
Au Co Ba
(6.6 • 0.3)xi0 -2 (6.2 -+ 0.2)xi0 -2 (6.1 -+ 0.5)xi0 -2
60 (I run)
Average 100
(2 runs)
Co Au(1) Au(2) Au(3) Ba(1 ) Ba(2)
0.I0 0.I0 0.11 0.11 0.I0 0.II Average
600
(I run)
Am Ba NIST 962a - cO NIST 962a - Cu NIST 962a - Au Thin film Average
1800
(5 runs)
Co(I ) Co(2) Co(3) Au(1) Au(2) Au (3) Au(4) Au(5) Au(6) I~
(6.3 +- 0 . 3 ) x 1 0 - 2 -+ 0.06 +- 0.02 -+ 0.02 -+ 0.03 + 0.08 -+ 0.05
0.105 + 0.005 0.60 0.60 0.53 0.53 0.58 0.54
+ 0.03 -+ 0.03 + 0.03 -+ 0.02 -+ 0.02 -+ 0.02
0.56 + 0.02 1.81 _+ 0.02 I .77 _+ 0.07 2.05 _+ 0.09 1 . 8 1 _+ 0.02 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.98 1.79 1.81
-+ -+ + ,+ ,+ ,+ 1 . 8 -+
(1 )
Ba(2) Ba(3)
0.01 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.2
2.0 -+ 0.I Average
487
1.8
+- 0.1
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
Table
I - continued
Irradiation time, s 3600 (8 runs)
Neutron monitor Co (I) co (2) Co (3) Co (4) Co (5) Co(6) co(7) co(8) Co (9) Au(1) Au(2) Au(3) Au(4) Au(5) Au(6) Au(7) Au(8) Au(9) Au (I0) Au(11) Au(12) Au (13) Au(14) Ba(1) Ba(2) Ba(3) Ba(4) Ba(5) Ba (6) Ba(7) ~ S T 962a - C o NIST 962a - C u NIST 962a - A u NIST 963a - C o NIST 963a - C u NIST 963a - A u Average
488
Fluence, n cm -2 x I 0 3.61 3.64 3.64 3.65 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.9 3.62 3.60 3.68 3.57 3.61 3.61 3.80 3.62 3.63 3.97 3.79 3.92 3.71 3.99 3.61 3.62 3.63 3.63 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.22 3.1 2.91 3.20
• 0.03 • 0.07 t 0.06 -+ 0.09 • 0.1 -4 0.1 -4- 0.1 • 0.1 -+ 0.1 • 0.02 • 0.01 • 0.05 • 0.04 • 0.05 • 0.05 • 0.05 • 0.05 • 0.07 + 0.04 • 0.07 • 0.03 • 0.07 • 0.09 • 0.03 • 0.04 • 0.04 • 0.04 • 0.2 -%+ 0.2 • 0.2 -+ 0.2 • 0.1 • 0.09 • 0.2 • 0.07 • 0.08
3.7 -+ 0.2
15
BIGAZZI el al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
Table
I - continued
Irradiation time, s
Neutron monitor
3660 (I run)
Fluence, n cm -2 x 1015
Au Ba NIST 962a - Cu
3.7 -+ 0.3 3.7 -+ 0.3 2.90 _+ 0.08
Average 4800 (I run)
3.7
4.8 4.4 4.1 4.5
Au NIST 963a - Co NIST 963a - Cu NIST 963a - Au Average
4.5 -+ 0.3
co(I) co (2)
7200
(1 run)
7.2-+0.1 7.4-+0.3 7.7-+0.2 7.9-+0.2 7.2-+0.5 6.7-+0.2 7.4-+0.2
Au(1) Au(2) NIST 963a - Co NIST 963a - C u NIST 963a - Au Average 10800 (I run)
-+ 0.2 -+ 0.3 -+ 0.2 -+ 0.2
7.4 -+ 0.4
Co(I) Co(2) Au(1) Au(2) Au(3)
10.9 10.8 "11.2 10.2 11 .I Average
+ 0.2 +- 0.2 -+ 0.4 + 0.3 -+ 0.2
10.8 -+ 0.4
Co, Au = activation foils; Ba = 140Ba activity from uranium disk; Thin film = thin uranium film on muscov i t e s u p p o r t ; N I S T 9 6 2 a , 9 6 3 a (Co, Cu, Au) = g l a s s with different calibrations carried out at NIST.
ing.
Therefore
radiation tion
time
never
may
be
and
963a
an
average
may
exceeds
observed glasses
be
evaluated,
5.5%.
for and
neutron
However,
fluences thin
whose
for
each
standard
a systematic
obtained
uranium 489
fluence
using
films:
deviatrend
NIST
their
ir-
962a
values
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION T R A C K DATING
TABLE
2
Neutron fluences in t h e t h e r m a l i z i n g c o l u m n of the T R I G A M A R K II r e s e a r c h reactor of t h e U n i v e r s i t y of P a v i a , as obt~:~ined u s i n g d i f f e r e n t neutron monitors Irradiation time, s 1020 (I run)
Neutron monitor
Fluence, n cm -2 x 1015
Au Ba
(2.50 • 0.05)xi0 -4 (2.50 + 0.05)xi0 -4 2.50xi 0 -4
Average 1800 (I run)
-~ Ba
(7.04 • 0.05)xi0 -4 (7.79 • 0.05)xi0 -4 Average
36640
nu Ba NIST 961 - Cu NIST 961 - Au Thin film Average
39600 (I run)
187 • o.4)xlOJ (8.8 (8.2 (9.1 (9.4
• 0.4)xI0_~ -+ 0.4)xI0_~ • 0.5)xI0_~ + 0.4)xi0-
(8.8 • 0.4)xi0 -3 (9.1 -+ 0.3)xi0 -3 (8.22 • 0.03)xi0 -3 (9.3 • 0.3)xi0 -3
Co Au Ba Average
257940
(7.4 _+ 0.5)xi04
Co Au Ba NIST 962a - Co NIST 962a - Cu NIST 962a - Au Average
(8.9 + 0.3)xi0 -3
(64 • 0.31xI0(6.5 (6.3 (6.3 (5.9 (6.4
• • • f •
0.3)xI0_~ 0.3)xi0 2 0.3)xi0- 9 0.2)xI0-~ 0.3)xi0--
(6.3 +- 0.3)xi0 -2
Co, A u = a c t i v a t i o n f o i l s ; Ba = 1 4 0 B a a c t i v i t y from uranium disk; Thin film = thin uranium film on muscovite support; N I S T 961, 9 6 2 a (Co, CU, Au) = g l a s s with different calibrations carried o u t at N I S T .
490
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
are always
lower. At the moment,
no explanation may be
advanced. Table
2 shows the neutron
thermalizing
fluences
column by using different
eters over a wide range of irradiation this case precision
dosim-
times.
for gold and 752•
for this irradiation
tained by activation
facility
reactions errors.
for cobalt.
and induced
fission agree
occur,
In the 1800 s run the fluence m o n i t o r e d
a lower fluence,
in the 39600
Agreement
is also very good with
uranium
film).
an overall
by
and thin
than the Cu calibration.
time may be evaluated, below 7%. A l t h o u g h
characterized
ization,
no differences
whose
for each
standard
devia-
in this irradiation
among the different
the time required
long and makes
fluence
by a better neutron
dated a neutron dose useful is very
(NIST glasses
average neutron
sitions,
are shown,
fluences obtained
In the former the NIST Au and Co calibra-
tions provide better results
tion remains
Yet gold foil activa-
s run.
track density measurement
irradiation
by 140Ba
compared to cobalt and
fission
Therefore,
some discrepancies
is higher with respect to the one
by gold foil activation.
tion yields 140Ba,
However
ratios
the fluences ob-
experimental
activity m e a s u r e m e n t
(greater
column a n d
within
obtained
Also in
below 5%. Cadmium
also in the thermalizing
found to be 92.3• Also
neutron
and for long irradiations
s) it is normally
have been m e a s u r e d
in the
increases w i t h induced radioactiv-
ity or track density than 36000
obtained
po-
flux thermaldosimeters
to give the samples to be for FT dating
this f a c i l i t y
(1015 n cm -2)
impractical
for
dating purposes. Fluence
data obtained
in the thermalizing
in the rotary
specimen
rack and
column of the TRIGA Mark II reactor
491
BIGAZZI et al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
of the U n i v e r s i t y stability power
of Pavia,
and r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y
conditions,
criticality
parameters
reactivity)
and n a t u r a l (burn-up,
must
fact if i r r a d i a t i o n are c o r r e l a t e d
of r e a c t o r
even if i r r a d i a t i o n s
o v e r a long time p e r i o d
excess
are i n d i c a t i v e
to a v e r a g e
out
of r e a c t o r
rods p o s i t i o n ,
As a m a t t e r
irradiation
fluences,
state
are c a r r i e d
control
for both
steady
variation
be c o n s i d e r e d .
times
of a great
highly
of
positions
significant
linear
c o r r e l a t i o n s are o b t a i n e d : y = 1.00 x 1012 X 13 1.5 x 10 and r = 0.9993 for the r o t a r y s p e c i m e n rack
and y = 2.4 x 108 X thermalizing In o r d e r
- 1.3 x 1011
to e m p h a s i z e
Fish Canyon Tuff
the u s e f u l n e s s
age
by USGS
Apatfte radiated the T R I G A
Canyon
apatite
operating
by the
9 6 3 a glass.
from the tuff,
in the r o t a r y
reactor while
The
fission
were
specimen
at 250 kW.
simultaneous
and N I S T
Survey),
M a 12
separated
for two h o u r s
Fish
is an i n t e r n a t i o n a l
(United S t a t e s G e o l o g i c a l
crystals,
Tuff
rock,
age is 2 7 . 8 •
d o s e was m o n i t o r e d the N I S T
the d a t i n g of
(USA) w a s c a r r i e d out by FTM.
a crystal-rich
reference
of an a c c u r a t e
for age d e t e r m i n a t i o n ,
C a n y o n Tuff, standard
for the
column.
neutron dosimetry
whose
and r = 0.9998
ir-
rack of Neutron
irradiation
track d e n s i t y
963a w a s m e a s u r e d
of
in F i s h by opti-
cal m e t h o d . The d e r i v e d agreement with
age is 2 7 . 9 • the r e f e r e n c e
that the n e u t r o n to yield, accurate
which age.
dose m o n i t o r i n g
u n d e r the d e s c r i b e d and r e l i a b l e
This
results
confirm
step used
is a d e q u a t e
experimental
conditions,
age d e t e r m i n a t i o n .
492
is in v e r y g o o d
BIGAZZI e! al.: FISSION TRACK DATING
REFERENCES I. J.C. Hadler, C.M.G. Lattes, A. Marques, M.D.D. Marques, D.A.B. Serra, G. Bigazzi, Nucl. T r a c k s Radiat. Meas. 5 (1981) 45. 2. J.C. Hadler, M e d i d a da c o s t a n t e de d i s i n t e g r a c a o por fissao espotanea, Ph.D. Thesis, U n i v e r s i d a d e E s t a t u a l de Campinas, C a m p i n a s SP (Brazil) (1982). 3. P.F. Green, A.J. 9 (1984) 231. 4. R.L. Fleischer, Eng., 22 (1965)
Hurford,
Nucl.
P.B. Price, 153.
R.M.
Tracks
Radiat.
Walker,
Nucl.
Meas.,
Sci.
5. D.M. Gillian, R.G. Helmer, R.C. G r e e n w o o d , J.W. Rogers, R.R. Heinrich, R.J. Popek, L.S. Kellog, E.R. Lippocoot, G.E. Hansen, W.H. Zimmer, Proc. 2nd ASTME u r a t o m Symp. R e a c t o r Dosim., Palo Alto, CA, R e p o r t N U R E G / G P - 0 0 0 4 , vol. 3 (1977) 1289. 6. S.A. Chitambar, Acta, 42 (1987)
H.C. 169.
Jain,
V. Ramaniah,
7. F.E. Senftle, T.A. Farley, L.R. Cosmochim. Acta, 6 (1954) 197. 8. H. Yagoda, Emulsions,
Stieff,
Radioactive Measurements Wiley, New York, 1949.
9. G. Bigazzi, J.C. Hadler, P.J. S.R. Paulo, G. Poupeau, Nucl. 17 (1990) 217.
Nucl.
Tracks
Radiat.
Geochim.
with N u c l e a r
Iunes, M. Oddone, Tracks Radiat. Meas.,
10. J.H. Roberts, F.H. Ruddy, R. Gold, Radiat. Meas., 8 (1984) 365. 11. T. Wall,
Radiochim.
Nucl.
Meas.,
12
Tracks,
(1986)
12. C.W. Naeser, R.A. Zimmermann, G.T. Cebula, Tracks Radiat. Meas., 5 (1981) 65.
493
887.
Nucl.